Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00137
Original file (BC 2014 00137.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF: 	DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01377

			COUNSEL:  NONE

		HEARING DESIRED:  NO 




APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

Her records be corrected to show she transferred her Post-9/11 GI Bill Education Benefits to her daughter while on active duty.  



APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

She was not briefed on the Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) program while on active duty; therefore, she was unable to utilize the TEB option for her daughter.  She requests the Board grant her an exemption so that her daughter can be given the opportunity to go to college and help her family.

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.



STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant initially entered the Regular Air Force on 6 Jan 99.  

On 5 Jan 04, the applicant was separated from the Regular Air Force and transferred to the Air Force Reserve.  

On 7 Jun 08, the applicant was honorably discharged from the Air Force Reserve.  

The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C.    





AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPSIT recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice.  The applicant was discharged from the Air Force Reserve 8 Jan 07 [sic] before the TEB program was implemented on 1 Aug 09.  A service member cannot obtain approval for a program that did not exist at the time of separation/retirement.  Title 38 U.S.C., Chapter 33, Section 3319 (f) (1) states: “an individual…may transfer such entitlement only while serving as a member of the armed forces when the transfer is executed.”

A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIT evaluation is at Exhibit C.



APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 28 Jul 14 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit D).  As of this date, no response has been received by this office.



THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice.  We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error of injustice.  We note the Air Force advisory opinion erroneously reflects the applicant’s discharge date as 8 Jan 07, instead of 7 Jun 08.  Nevertheless, the fact remains that the applicant was discharged from the Air Force Reserve prior to 1 Aug 09, when the transfer of educational benefits (TEB) for the Post-9/11 GI Bill was established, therefore rendering her ineligible to transfer her benefits.  Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the requested relief.



THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.



The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2014-01377 in Executive Session on 13 Jan 15 under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

	

The following documentary evidence pertaining AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2014-01377 was considered:

	Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 15 Jan 14.
	Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
	Exhibit C.  Memorandum, AFPC/DPSIT, dated 9 Apr 14.
Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 28 Jul 14.

						




3

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY – PRIVACY ACT OF 1974


FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY – PRIVACY ACT OF 1974
1

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY – PRIVACY ACT OF 1974


FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY – PRIVACY ACT OF 1974
4

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00168

    Original file (BC 2014 00168.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is included at Exhibit E. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIT recommends granting the applicant’s request noting the applicant may not have received accurate information regarding transferring education benefits to his dependents. Service members of the Armed Forces who, on or after 1 Aug 09, eligible for the Post-9/11 GI Bill, had...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00189

    Original file (BC 2014 00189.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Under the Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) website, it notifies the applicants that their transfer request is not final until the SOU is digitally signed in the Virtual Military Personnel Flight (vMPF). On 12 Oct 10, an email was sent to the applicant informing her that her application for TEB had expired because she did not sign the SOU. As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit D).

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03824

    Original file (BC 2014 03824.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Post-9/11 GI Bill Transferability: Any Service member on or after 1 August 2009, who is entitled to the Post-9/11 GI Bill at the time of the approval of his or her request to transfer that entitlement, may transfer that entitlement provided he or she meets one of these conditions: * Has at least 6 years of service in the Military Services (active duty or Selected Reserve), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Commissioned Officer Corps (NOAA) Corps, or Commissioned Corps of the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05445

    Original file (BC 2013 05445.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Since the applicant served on active duty since 11 Sep 01, he was entitled to Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits in his own right and was otherwise eligible to transfer said benefits to his dependents, provided he met the prescribed active duty service commitment (ADSC) of four years. Had the applicant successfully transferred his benefits on the date requested (3 Apr 10), he would have incurred a four-year ADSC requiring him to serve until at least 2 Apr 14. THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00064

    Original file (BC 2014 00064 .txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00064 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She be allowed to transfer her Post-9/11 GI Bill educational benefits. DPSIT recommends the applicant’s request for TEB be approved effective 1 Jun 10, the date the VA Form 22-1990 was submitted. THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02355

    Original file (BC-2012-02355.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02355 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be allowed to transfer his Post 9/11 GI Bill benefits to his dependents. If the Board finds there was an injustice to the extent that the member did not receive adequate pre-separation counseling, as required by law and DoD regulation, and was...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03695

    Original file (BC 2014 03695.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-03695 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She be allowed to transfer her Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits (TEB) to her dependents. Without a request, a TEB application cannot be approved and eligibility cannot be determined. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02064

    Original file (BC 2014 02064.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    In accordance with AFI 36-2306, “For individuals eligible for retirement on 1 Aug 09, no additional service is required.” Given that the applicant was eligible for retirement prior to 1 Aug 09, he would have incurred no active duty service commitment (ADSC) obligation with TEB approval. Based on the applicant’s retirement date, he retired prior to the TEB program being established and therefore, he is not eligible to transfer benefits to his dependents. THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00585

    Original file (BC 2014 00585.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00585 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to show he transferred his Post-9/11 GI Bill Education Benefits to his dependents while on active duty. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03835

    Original file (BC 2013 03835.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-03835 COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be allowed to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill Educational benefits to his dependents without incurring an additional Active Duty Service Commitment (ADSC). The applicant provides no evidence of error or injustice on the part of the Air...